Goodreads has 42,945 ratings of this book, and 2,892 reviews. What can I
 possibly say that hasn’t been said already, and considerably better 
than any combination of words I can come up with? Nothing at all, 
probably, but I’m going to have a bash anyway.
I first read this 
many years ago, and regarded it as one of the best books I’d ever read. 
This time, I tried the audiobook version, read by Dominic West, who has 
the appropriate gravitas for Stevens the butler. The plot - well, it 
hardly matters, being merely a vehicle to demonstrate the buttoned-up 
and rather tragic personality of Stevens himself, reminiscencing on the 
past glory days of the house where he serves. His memories of past 
events, coloured entirely by his own fossilised perspective of the 
professional nature of being in service, form the body of the story.
This
 has to be one of the finest descriptions of a single mind I have ever 
read. The author uses language with such skill that the reader 
completely understands Stevens and his world view, while also 
appreciating that the events described solely from his perspective are 
capable of alternative interpretations. While Stevens performs his 
duties with impeccable care, he is completely oblivious to the social 
nuances emanating from the people and events around him, which leads him
 occasionally to behave in misguided, almost wilfully blind, ways. 
Meanwhile his employer, Lord Darlington, is equally misguided in his 
efforts to promote the cause of Fascist Germany and equally oblivious to
 political nuances. Several times Lord Darlington is referred to as an 
amateur in politics, which contrasts elegantly with the professionalism 
of the butler.
I am not sure that I agree with the apparent 
suggestion of the later parts of the book that master and servant have 
both wasted their lives on inappropriate efforts. History is written by 
the victors, and if the war had turned out differently, then those who, 
like Lord Darlington, made approaches towards Hitler would have been 
fêted as heroes, not lambasted as near-traitors. And any employee who 
has done his job to the very best of his ability for many years can 
hardly be said to have wasted his life. I’m not sure that Stevens would 
ever have been capable of a normal life, regardless of occupation, so it
 seems unlikely that he made unreasonable sacrifices for his job. 
Frankly, I wondered quite what Miss Kenton saw in him.
Even with 
the benefit of hindsight, I still see little wrong with this book. The 
language is perfectly tuned for the voice of Stevens, the insight into 
his personality is profound and there is enough social commentary hidden
 below the surface to satisfy the need for depth. Five stars.
 
 
I love this book but I haven't written a review for the reason you stated at the beginning of yours - I really think every single feature of this one was discussed to death.
ReplyDeleteI’m not sure that Stevens would ever have been capable of a normal life, regardless of occupation, so it seems unlikely that he made unreasonable sacrifices for his job. Frankly, I wondered quite what Miss Kenton saw in him.
If Stevens failed it was just because he didn't have the courage to change anything in his life before it was too late. I suppose Miss Kenton saw in him the stability and trust such men can provide. Still he was too rigid to meet her half way.