It’s hard to know quite what to make of this novella. Like the curate’s
egg, it’s good in parts. The good part is the lead character himself,
Stephen Leeds, with his multitude of ‘aspects’ (hallucinations), who act
as independent beings with a variety of personalities and areas of
expertise, even though they’re invisible to everyone else. They hold
conversations with Stephen, and with each other, and ‘advise’ him during
his investigative work. When he needs to speak a new language, for
instance, he skim-reads a book and then an aspect appears who translates
for him. This is great fun, and the interaction between the different
aspects, and between them and Stephen, is terrific. I have no idea
whether such a situation is plausible, but it’s an entertaining read.
The
actual plot, however, is a lot more flimsy, involving a camera with the
ability to take pictures of the past, its reclusive inventor and the
various organisations that want to exploit the device. Frankly, this
part was quite silly, and the heavy overtones of religious debate
tedious (the idea being that the camera could conclusively prove or
disprove fundamental tenets of various religions). Then the whole
dramatic climax and resolution seemed very rushed to me. I know it’s
only a novella, but this felt like a full-length novel that had been cut
down to fit, rather than having the structure and pacing of a true
novella.
I don’t know whether this is intended as a one off, or
whether the author is laying out the groundwork for a series of books
later. There’s some unresolved backstory about a former girlfriend which
suggests there’s more to come. There’s certainly scope for development,
and the aspects have loads of potential (although it does seem a little
convenient, since whatever expertise Stephen needs, he can summon a
hallucination with the requisite knowledge and experience). Hopefully,
any future stories will have a more believable plot. Three stars.
The actual plot, however, is a lot more flimsy, involving a camera with the ability to take pictures of the past, its reclusive inventor and the various organisations that want to exploit the device. Frankly, this part was quite silly, and the heavy overtones of religious debate tedious (the idea being that the camera could conclusively prove or disprove fundamental tenets of various religions).
ReplyDeleteDefinitely not my piece of cake, thanks for the review.